Advertisement

Regulator downgrades ratings for four Colchester care homes

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has downgraded the ratings for four Colchester care homes run by Maple Health UK Limited, following inspections in October and November.

Maple View, Maple Lodge, Maple Manor and Maple Cottage all provide personal care for up to five autistic people and people with learning disabilities. All four care homes are registered separately but located on the same cul-de-sac.

water droplets on glass panel

A fifth sister service on this cul-de-sac, Maple House, was rated inadequate by the CQC in November. The inspections of the other four care homes were prompted in part by concerns around the use of unauthorised physical restraint found at Maple House.

Following these inspections, the overall ratings for Maple View and Maple Lodge have dropped from good to inadequate. Their rating has also dropped from good to inadequate for safety and leadership. Their rating has dropped from good to requires improvement for effectiveness.

The overall ratings for Maple Manor and Maple Cottage have dropped from good to requires improvement. Their rating has also dropped from good to requires improvement for safety, leadership and effectiveness.

The CQC has now placed Maple View and Maple Lodge into special measures, which means they will be kept under close review by the regulator.

The CQC has also issued the provider two warning notices in relation to their oversight of Maple View and Maple Lodge, to focus their attention on making immediate improvements.

Rebecca Bauers, the CQC’s director for people with a learning disability and autistic people, said: ‘When we inspected these care homes, it was deeply concerning to find people had been disproportionately and unsafely restrained at Maple View and Maple Lodge. While we didn’t find issues with restraint at Maple Manor and Maple Cottage, we saw the provider lacked oversight of people’s care at all four homes.

‘Inspectors found the provider hadn’t booked appropriate training for staff to support people in the least restrictive way, to ensure people’s safety, until CQC raised concerns at a sister service in October.

‘Where people had been restrained unsafely or unlawfully at Maple View and Maple Lodge, we found the provider hadn’t always learned lessons to keep people safe in future and hadn’t always reported these incidents to the local authority’s safeguarding team or CQC as legally required. Staff at both homes didn’t always understand the Mental Capacity Act, risking violations of people’s human rights.

‘At the time of inspection, the provider had booked staff training in all their homes on how and when physical interventions may be used safely and in people’s individual best interests, to be completed by December. The provider was also working with the local authority to address our concerns.

‘We’ve used our enforcement powers and issued warning notices for Maple View and Lodge to highlight areas needing significant and immediate improvement.

‘We’ll continue to closely monitor all four homes, including through further inspections, to make sure people are receiving the safe care they deserve, and won’t hesitate to take further action if needed.’

Image: Barefoot Communications

More on this topic:

Dentists issue warning over worsening oral health in care homes

Recruitment freeze in Bristol sparks fears for elderly in care homes

Comments

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Help us break the news – share your information, opinion or analysis
Back to top